The political landscape of England is on the brink of significant transformations as the Boundary Commission for England and the Local Government Boundary Commission embark on reviews and consultations regarding electoral boundaries. These processes aim to ensure fair representation and adjust divisions based on population changes. The latest Parliamentary review, conducted under the purview of the Boundary Commission for England, has sparked debates and concerns among communities, particularly in areas such as Consett, Medomsley, and the surrounding areas.

The Boundary Commission for England is an independent and impartial non-departmental public body entrusted with the responsibility of reviewing Parliamentary boundaries across England. Its primary objective is to examine and, if necessary, revise the existing constituency boundaries to ensure they accurately reflect changes in population distribution. By periodically assessing and adjusting these boundaries, the commission seeks to maintain fairness and equity in the electoral system.

The latest Parliamentary review commenced in January 2021, and it has garnered attention and even scepticism due to the timing coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. The review process included several rounds of proposals and consultations, allowing the public to express their views and opinions on the suggested changes. Initial proposals were made available for public consultation in June 2021, with subsequently revised proposals released in February and November 2022, followed by respective consultation periods. Ultimately, all consultations closed in December 2022, leading to the anticipation of the final report’s approval in Parliament, scheduled for July 2023.

The impact of these proposed changes is of particular concern for residents in Consett, Medomsley, and the surrounding areas in North Durham. Initial assessments indicated relatively minimal alterations to the boundaries of the 11 wards in North Durham. However, due to population decline, a broader restructuring was required within the sub-regions of County Durham, South Tyneside, and Sunderland, leading to a reduction from 11 to 10 divisions.

In addition to the Boundary Commission for England, there exists a similar body specifically dedicated to County divisions. This body, often associated with County Councils, oversees the review and adjustment of electoral boundaries at the local government level. County divisions, represented by Councillors, play a crucial role in local governance and decision-making processes.

This article aims to delve into the implications of the latest Parliamentary review and shed light on the ongoing consultation process for County electoral boundaries in County Durham. By examining the proposed changes and their potential effects, we can better understand the concerns and voices of the communities affected by these adjustments. 

Changes in Parliamentary Boundaries – The New Blaydon and Consett County Constituency

The proposed changes to Parliamentary boundaries in England have raised concerns and sparked discussions, particularly in North Durham and its surrounding areas. To understand the impact of these alterations, let us explore the initial status of North Durham’s boundaries, the effects of the second review on Consett, Medomsley, and the surrounding region, the description of the proposed Blaydon and Consett County Constituency, and the specific wards that will be affected by these changes.

View the Blaydon and Consett County Constituency here

Learn more from The Boundary Commission for England

Initially, the boundaries of the 11 wards in North Durham remained largely untouched. However, due to population changes and the need to ensure fair representation, the second review significantly altered the political landscape of the region. Under the revised proposals, North Durham would no longer include the Consett, Medomsley, and Leadgate areas. Instead, these areas would become part of a new constituency, the Blaydon and Consett County Constituency.

The Blaydon and Consett County Constituency would encompass parishes stretching from Consett, County Durham all the way to Blaydon, Tyne & Wear, resulting in a new configuration for representation in the area. Any future Member of Parliament (MP) elected for this constituency would serve this entire region. This newly proposed constituency is also divided into 11 wards, each playing a crucial role in shaping the local political landscape. Notable wards affected by these changes include Ward 1 – Benfieldside, Ward 5 – Consett North, Ward 6 – Consett South, and Ward 8 – Delves Lane, among others.

Of particular interest is Ward 9, which includes Medomsley, Leadgate, Ebchester, and a part of Hamsterley Mill. The ward’s boundaries follow the river, extending to the northwest and north. These proposed changes in boundaries have significant implications for the communities residing within these areas. The final report outlining these alterations is expected to be approved by Parliament in July 2023, solidifying the transformation of electoral boundaries.

The existing local boundaries for in and around Consett, County Durham (above)

The draft proposed local boundaries for in and around Consett, County Durham (above)

Find out more and explore the proposed boundaries here.

It is essential to examine the potential effects of these changes on local communities, their interests, and their access to appropriate representation. As we delve deeper into the topic, we will explore the concerns and perspectives of the residents in Consett, Medomsley, and the surrounding areas, shedding light on the potential impact of these alterations.

In addition to the proposed changes to Parliamentary boundaries, County Durham is also undergoing a consultation process regarding electoral boundaries at the local government level. This consultation aims to gather input and feedback on the proposed adjustments to County electoral divisions. Let’s delve into the details of this consultation, the objectives of the Local Government Boundary Commission, the proposed reduction in the number of County Councillors and divisions, and the potential changes to division boundaries.

The ongoing consultation on changes to electoral boundaries in County Durham is a vital opportunity for residents and local organisations to have their voices heard. Spearheaded by the Local Government Boundary Commission, the consultation seeks to gather input and opinions on the proposed adjustments. County electoral divisions, represented by County Councillors, play a significant role in shaping local governance and decision-making processes, making public participation in this consultation crucial.

The Local Government Boundary Commission operates with specific objectives in mind. One of their primary aims is to equalise the number of voters in each division, ensuring that representation aligns with the principle of “one person, one vote.” By reviewing and modifying boundaries, the commission aims to address population changes and maintain balance across divisions. Additionally, they consider a certain number of parameters to guide their decision-making process.

One key proposal within the County electoral boundary consultation is the reduction in the number of County Councillors. The current count stands at 126, but the proposed changes would bring this number down to 98. This reduction aims to streamline governance and achieve a more efficient and representative structure.

Furthermore, the commission has identified the need for potential changes to the boundaries of nearly all divisions within County Durham. This could result in a significant reshaping of electoral divisions, impacting the representation and political dynamics in various areas. The specific nature of these potential changes is yet to be finalised, but they are supposed to ensure fair and equitable representation based on population distribution.

The potential reduction in the number of County Councillors and the anticipated changes to division boundaries will have a profound impact on local representation. 

Have Your Say! Participate in the Consultation

The consultation on changes to electoral boundaries in County Durham provides residents with an opportunity to actively participate in shaping the future of local representation. If you wish to have your voice heard and contribute to this important process, here is the information you need to participate in the consultation.

The Local Government Boundary Commission has made it convenient for residents to engage in the consultation by providing various avenues for submitting views and opinions. The primary method is through their website, which can be accessed at http://www.lgbce.org.uk/all-reviews/county-durham. On the website, you will find comprehensive information about the proposed changes, including maps, reports, and supporting documents. Engaging in social media discussions regarding the article will likely yield little response or acknowledgement, so it’s best to use official channels to voice your concerns.

To submit your views via email, you can send your thoughts to reviews@lgbce.org.uk. This allows you to articulate your perspective and concerns in a written format directly to the commission. Ensure that your email clearly expresses your thoughts on the proposed changes and how they may impact your community or area of interest.

If you prefer traditional correspondence, you have the option to write a letter sharing your views. Address your letter to the Review Officer, LGBCE, PO Box 133, BLYTH, NE24 9FE. It is essential to include your thoughts on the proposed changes and any specific concerns you may have. Providing clear and concise arguments will strengthen the impact of your submission.

While the Local Government Boundary Commission has made efforts to facilitate public engagement, it is worth noting that some challenges have been reported with their website. Navigating through the site and finding the relevant information may not always be straightforward. However, it is crucial not to be discouraged by these difficulties. If you encounter any issues, consider seeking assistance from local community groups or contacting the commission directly for guidance.

Remember, the consultation period will only run until Monday, the 10th of July 2023. This time frame allows you to have an opportunity to thoroughly consider the proposed changes and gather input from your community. By actively participating in the consultation, you contribute to the democratic process and help shape the electoral boundaries of County Durham.

Your participation in the consultation is essential to ensure that the voices and concerns of the residents are taken into account. Whether you choose to submit your views through the website, via email, or by writing a letter, make sure to express your thoughts clearly and thoughtfully. 

Together, we can shape the future of local representation in County Durham.

Purpose of Proposed Changes

The proposed changes to electoral boundaries in County Durham serve a specific purpose: to achieve a fair and equitable distribution of voters across divisions. The Local Government Boundary Commission aims to ensure that each division has a similar number of voters, allowing for equal representation and upholding the principle of “one person, one vote.” Let’s explore the purpose behind these changes, the consideration of certain number parameters, and the specific proposals for the Consett North and Burnhopfield, Dipton, and Ebchester divisions.

One of the primary objectives of the proposed changes is to equalise the number of voters in each division. This principle aims to address imbalances that may arise due to population fluctuations over time. By ensuring that the number of voters in each division is similar, the commission aims to maintain fairness and equity in the representation of constituents. This approach ensures that no division is disproportionately burdened or advantaged in terms of electoral influence.

In the process of reviewing and modifying boundaries, the Local Government Boundary Commission takes into account a certain number of parameters. These parameters help guide the decision-making process and ensure that the proposed divisions align with reasonable criteria. By considering these parameters, such as the ideal range of voters per division, the commission aims to strike a balance that reflects the diverse communities and interests within County Durham.

Within the context of these proposed changes, two divisions, namely Consett North and Burnopfield, Dipton, and Ebchester, Hamsterley and Low Westwood require particular attention. The commission has proposed a two-councillor Consett North division, linking the villages of Leadgate and Medomsley with the northern part of Consett. This proposal aims to address the population changes and create a cohesive division representing these areas’ shared interests. Similarly, two-councillor Burnopfield, Dipton, and Ebchester divisions have been proposed. However, it is important to note that one aspect of this proposal diverges from the community’s expectations. The inclusion of The Dene (comprising Grange Farm, The Dene, Denecrest, and Denesyde) in this division separates it from the main village of Medomsley, which is included in Consett North.

This specific alteration, made primarily to meet the suggested number of guidelines, has raised concerns among residents. The Dene area, although housing-centric with no specific facilities like a church, school, or community building, is considered a satellite housing estate that is connected to and reliant on the main village of Medomsley. The decision to separate The Dene from Consett North, solely based on numerical considerations, overlooks the community’s interdependence and shared services with the neighbouring areas. A proper representation that aligns with the communities’ needs and connections should be a paramount consideration in boundary adjustments.

As the consultation progresses, it is essential to carefully evaluate these proposed changes and their potential impact on local communities. Balancing the number of voters in each division is crucial, but it is equally important to consider the social and geographical cohesion of communities when determining division boundaries. Through active participation in the consultation process, residents can express their concerns, present alternative proposals, and ensure that the final electoral boundaries truly serve the interests and needs of the diverse population within County Durham.

Concerns and Community Impact

One of the most contentious aspects of the proposed changes to electoral boundaries in County Durham is the inclusion of The Dene, Ebchester, Low Estwood and Hamsterley in the Burnopfield, Dipton divisions, rather than with the Consett North division. This decision has raised significant concerns among residents and has sparked a debate about the impact on community cohesion and representation.

For example, The Dene, consisting of Grange Farm, The Dene, Denecrest, and Denesyde, is an area closely tied to the main village of Medomsley. While The Dene may lack certain standalone facilities such as a church, school, or community building, it serves as a satellite housing estate that is an integral part of the wider Medomsley community. Residents of The Dene rely on the main village and its neighbouring areas for essential facilities, services, and social connections.

In terms of infrastructure and services, residents of The Dene heavily depend on Consett and Leadgate. These neighbouring areas provide access to critical amenities, including shops, healthcare facilities, and emergency services like police and ambulance. Additionally, Consett and Leadgate serve as hubs for community activities and social interactions, acting as the primary centres for residents in The Dene.

The decision to include The Dene, Ebchester, Hamsterley and Low Westwood in the Burnopfield, Dipton, and Ebchester divisions, seemingly driven solely by the need to meet numerical guidelines, has been met with criticism from much of the local community. This inclusion separates The Dene from the main village of Medomsley, disregarding the intimate connections and shared services between these areas. The result is a potential loss of community representation and isolation of residents who rely on the facilities, services, and social networks provided by Consett and Leadgate.

The concerns regarding this decision extends beyond logistical considerations. By isolating The Dene and Ebchester within the Burnopfield, Dipton, and Ebchester divisions, there is a risk of diluting the voice and representation of the community. The interests and needs of The Dene residents may differ significantly from those in the broader Burnopfield area, highlighting the importance of maintaining cohesive divisions that truly reflect the social dynamics and shared identities of communities. Not to mention the fact there would be a possible requirement for voters to have pay to use public transport to vote in elections, due to older or less able residents being unable to walk directly to Burnopfield, Ebchester or Dipton – they would need to get a bus or two depending on the location of their voting station – unless of course there is a mobile polling station to be available at The Dene. This is still unknown. 

Critics argue that prioritising numerical parameters over community connections and representation undermines the principles of effective governance. Electoral boundaries should not only strive for numerical balance but also consider the social fabric and interdependencies that exist between neighbouring areas. It is crucial to ensure that divisions accurately reflect the reality of communities and their relationships, rather than creating artificial divisions that may hinder effective representation and community engagement.

As the consultation period continues, it is vital for residents, community organisations, and local leaders to voice their concerns regarding the inclusion of The Dene in the Burnopfield, Dipton, and Ebchester divisions. By highlighting the significance of community connections, the reliance on neighbouring areas, and the potential for isolation and reduced representation, stakeholders can advocate for alternative proposals that better reflect the needs and aspirations of the residents in The Dene and Medomsley. It is through this active engagement that the consultation process can achieve outcomes that truly serve the best interests of the communities within County Durham.

So, what does this all mean for local constituents (voters)? 

As the proposed changes to Parliamentary and County boundaries in County Durham continue to be scrutinised, it is evident that the process raises significant questions and concerns regarding fair representation and community considerations. By recapitulating the key modifications, emphasising the importance of these principles, and anticipating the final report’s approval in Parliament, it becomes clear that further engagement and deliberation are necessary.

The revisions to the Parliamentary boundaries, particularly the creation of the Blaydon and Consett County Constituency, have reshaped the electoral landscape of North Durham. While population changes necessitated changes, the decision to include certain areas in specific divisions warrants closer examination. The inclusion of The Dene, Ebchester, Low Estwood and Hamsterley in the Burnopfield and Dipton division, rather than with the Consett North division, has sparked considerable debate due to the impact on community cohesion and representation. For example, the interdependence and shared services between The Dene and the main village of Medomsley raise questions about the criteria used to determine boundaries and the extent to which community considerations were taken into account.

In parallel, the consultation on changes to County electoral boundaries aims to achieve fair and equitable representation for County Durham residents. The reduction in the number of County Councillors and divisions reflects the desire to align electoral boundaries with the changing demographics of the region. Ensuring that the interests and needs of residents are properly represented requires thoughtful consideration of social connections, shared services, and community identities. However and wherever local people vote in The Dene, Ebchester, Hamsterley and Low Westwood, they will be voting for councillors who do not represent the areas which they rely upon, use and need.

Engaging with local MPs and the Local Boundary Commission for England is an essential step towards achieving transparency and addressing the concerns raised by residents. By posing these questions, we can hold our representatives accountable for ensuring that the final boundaries genuinely reflect the communities they serve and provide fair and effective representation.

Looking ahead, the final report on the proposed changes is expected to be approved by Parliament in July. The approval will mark a significant milestone in the process, but it should not signify the end of the conversation. Rather, it should serve as a starting point for ongoing dialogue and continuous improvement of the electoral boundaries to ensure that the needs, aspirations, and voices of County Durham residents are properly represented and preserved.

In the pursuit of fair representation and community consideration, let us collectively work towards creating electoral boundaries that reflect the diverse fabric of County Durham and foster effective governance.